TIMELINE OF THE CASE
August, 2003 |
I write to Scott Adams
of "Dilbert". I wanted attention on this most serious
matter. |
September 24, 2003 |
Our TAA Petition Exhibits
I used the patent of Vantage-One software which describes itself as a product, to prove that software is a indeed product.
Quite ingenious, if you ask me! |
October 24, 2003 |
First TAA Denial |
November 14, 2003 |
CT Senator Dodd intervenes on our behalf |
November 24, 2003 |
Our First Appeal
|
February 3, 2004 |
Our First Appeal Denied
|
March
4, 2004 |
Letter to CT Senator Dodd informing of appeal
results
|
July
8, 2004 |
Senator Dodd
suggests the pro bono legal team of Sidley to handle our arbitration.
Good thing he did. |
August 2, 2004 |
CSC's Petition
|
February 3, 2004 |
Second Denial
|
|
Second Appeal
|
July 29, 2004 |
Third Denial |
August 24, 2005 |
This
was our last chance. It is called "Appeal on Remand". |
January 27, 2006 |
The
U.S. Court of International Trade asks the U.S. DOL to explain
all the denials. |
March 24, 2006 |
Finally Approved
|
May
1, 2006 |
Case dismissed. We Won!
|
THE PRESS AFTER WE WON
IT'S EVEN MENTIONED IN BOOKS !
|
This is probably the best thing I ever did. It came out of anger...
Myself and two work associates presented the U.S. Department of Labor with a lawsuit.
We contended that our jobs were moved offshore and that we should be
entitled to
'Trade Adjustment Assistance' (TAA). For example: let's
say a shoe manufacturer in South Carolina decides to get his shoes
made in China and lays off some workers as result. Those workers qualify
for TAA assistance because they made an 'article' as defined by the
U.S. Department of Labor. However, because
computer software was not
recognized as a 'tangible product' by the DOL, software workers who
were layed off when their jobs were shipped to India or elsewhere, did not qualify
for TAA assistance.
This really made me mad and I wanted to find out
why...
It turns out the DOL did not know about the
Internet....this is 2003. The DOL determined what was recognized as a 'tangible product'
if it went through customs. In other words, a physical thing. This was
a DOL law dating back to 1974. We had to inform the DOL that computer
software was transferred over the 'ether' of the internet and thereby
passed customs completely...and that computer software is a viable product which was
sold for profit....We applied in 2003. We kept getting denied. We
kept appealing the decision. It took until
March 24, 2006 before computer
software was recognized as a 'tangible product'...
Our group was the first to be certified.
Followed by EDS workers, then IBM workers.
This opened the TAA benefit gates for hundreds of thousands of computer software workers
I'm very proud of that fact.
I started it and I finished it.
|